{"id":9577,"date":"2012-11-21T18:08:37","date_gmt":"2012-11-21T17:08:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pornoanwalt.de\/?p=9577"},"modified":"2012-11-21T18:10:42","modified_gmt":"2012-11-21T17:10:42","slug":"i-know-it-when-i-see-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/?p=9577","title":{"rendered":"I know it when I see it"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-9579\" title=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/potter-stewart.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"301\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/potter-stewart.jpg 250w, https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/potter-stewart-249x300.jpg 249w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px\" \/>Der <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States\">U.S. Supreme Court<\/a> urteilte 1963 in seiner Entscheidung zu <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jacobellis_v._Ohio\">Jacobellis v. Ohio<\/a>, dass der franz\u00f6sische Film <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Lovers_(1958_film)\">Die Liebenden<\/a>\u00a0nicht &#8222;obsz\u00f6n&#8220; ist. In einem Sondervotum erl\u00e4uterte Richter <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Potter_Stewart\">Potter Stewart<\/a>\u00a0mit dem <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/I_know_it_when_I_see_it\">ber\u00fchmt gewordenen Ausspruch<\/a>, warum kein Fall von Pornografie vorliegt:<\/p>\n<p><em>I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [&#8222;hard core pornography&#8220;], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But<strong> I know it when I see it<\/strong>, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Der U.S. Supreme Court urteilte 1963 in seiner Entscheidung zu Jacobellis v. Ohio, dass der franz\u00f6sische Film Die Liebenden\u00a0nicht &#8222;obsz\u00f6n&#8220; ist. In einem Sondervotum erl\u00e4uterte Richter Potter Stewart\u00a0mit dem ber\u00fchmt gewordenen Ausspruch, warum kein Fall von Pornografie vorliegt: I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2458,2459,1333,2460],"class_list":["post-9577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemeines","tag-i-know-it-when-i-see-it","tag-jacobellis-v-ohio","tag-obszon","tag-potter-stewart"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9577"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9577\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9593,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9577\/revisions\/9593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}