{"id":304,"date":"2009-04-06T15:23:03","date_gmt":"2009-04-06T14:23:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pornoanwalt.de\/?p=304"},"modified":"2009-10-20T19:09:28","modified_gmt":"2009-10-20T17:09:28","slug":"vollerotik-nicht-unterscheidungskraftig","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/?p=304","title":{"rendered":"Vollerotik nicht unterscheidungskr\u00e4ftig"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/03\/20090320_wipo.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Beschluss<\/a> vom 28. Januar 2009, ver\u00f6ffentlicht am 3. April 2009, hat das Bundespatentgericht entschieden, dass die Wortmarke &#8222;Vollerotik&#8220; nicht die notwendige Unterscheidungskraft gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 8 Absatz 2 Nr. 1 Markengesetz besitzt und einem Freihaltungsbedu\u0308rfnis gema\u0308\u00df \u00a7 8 Absatz 2 Nr. 2 Markengesetz unterliegt. Der Begriff &#8222;Vollerotik&#8220; ist vom ehemaligen Premiere-Gesch\u00e4ftsf\u00fchrer Dr. Georg Kofler f\u00fcr pornografisches PayTV erfunden worden.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pornoanwalt.de\/?p=304\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-306\" title=\"vollerotik\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/04\/vollerotik.jpg\" alt=\"vollerotik\" width=\"443\" height=\"257\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/04\/vollerotik.jpg 615w, https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/04\/vollerotik-300x173.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 443px) 100vw, 443px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mit Beschluss vom 28. Januar 2009, ver\u00f6ffentlicht am 3. April 2009, hat das Bundespatentgericht entschieden, dass die Wortmarke &#8222;Vollerotik&#8220; nicht die notwendige Unterscheidungskraft gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 8 Absatz 2 Nr. 1 Markengesetz besitzt und einem Freihaltungsbedu\u0308rfnis gema\u0308\u00df \u00a7 8 Absatz 2 Nr. 2 Markengesetz unterliegt. Der Begriff &#8222;Vollerotik&#8220; ist vom ehemaligen Premiere-Gesch\u00e4ftsf\u00fchrer Dr. Georg Kofler f\u00fcr [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[183,187,189,185,180,188,186,184],"class_list":["post-304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemeines","tag-bundespatentgericht","tag-freihaltebedurfnis","tag-georg-kofler","tag-markengesetz","tag-paytv","tag-premiere","tag-unterscheidungskraft","tag-vollerotik"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=304"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1116,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304\/revisions\/1116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornoanwalt.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}